Perhaps the only thing more difficult than giving criticism is receiving it. When faced with criticism, people generally respond with “fight or flight” behaviour. Fighting manifests itself as defensive, argumentative or counterattack remarks.In the long run, neither method solves the problem as effectively as (i) agreeing with the criticism or (ii) seeking more information.
Criticisms can be based on facts, perceptions, or both. If, for example, your supervisor identifies computational errors in your work, he or she may perceive these facts as being related to inability or carelessness. Arguing about the facts (computational errors) is futile, but you can redirect the perception by pointing out that these errors are the exception, not the rule, in your work performance.
Showing interest in what prompts the criticism can help you decide how to fix whatever prompted it. Ask for specific examples. “You’ve said I’m not presenting a good attitude to customers. Can you describe exactly what I’m doing?” (Beware of your tone!).
|