You are browsing the archive for Contradictions / Conflicts.

Avatar of admin

by admin

Opportunity Vs Equality

February 7, 2012 in Contradictions / Conflicts

Both are contradictory to each to other. Balance has the answer in it.

High Opportunity – Low equality
Cities have higher opportunities but low equality. You may see slum and high rises living together. Slum provides low cost jobs like maid, driver, helper, or shopkeeper. High rises have high end jobs like engineers, doctors, and experts. It has a downside of no emotional link between the two extremes.

Low Opportunity – High equality
Villages have high equality comparatively to cities. Income gap is not so high. They talk to each other and link with each other easily, but low opportunity slows down the speed of life.

Low Opportunity – Low equality
Terrorist hits area can be fit in this category. Power centricity varies from person to person and they also don’t have any opportunity to grow.

High opportunity – High Equality
Earlier US culture was good example of it. There both opportunity and equality were working together. Openness and transparency is high.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Avatar of admin

by admin

Perfection should not be at the cost of NO ACTION

January 27, 2012 in Business Process, Contradictions / Conflicts, Management, Quality

Perfection is IFR (Ideal Final Result) state. Some managers fall in love with word “PERFECTION”. For them, perfection should be everywhere in reports, paper-work, product, template, or systems. In current fast moving world, time is money. No doubt, quality is also money. Balancing both needs smart acts. We can’t keep polishing something at the cost of already irritated customer. We also can’t give raw product to let him polish. Speed with quality is ultimate goal. Some manager loose on quality front while other loose on time.

Let me think like a perfectionist. Quality has immense value. World has enough cumulative time, however, perfection is lacking. Many people are delivering mediocre products and services. It has resulted in poor brands. Branding needs perfection or differentiation. Brand built on strong foundations have long shelf life. It needs continuous value add or efforts to make it perfect. Buyers appreciate perfection and are ready to pay more for it.

It has negative side too. For example, I am working in a company which is working on system development. Each day implementation model is changing as management wants to build it on strong foundation. Other developments are on hold as perfect product will get delivered and employees will use brand new faster system. Timelines are changing and rounds of discussions are happening on exceptions. Few intellectuals are discussing in meeting rooms on perfection ground while others are waiting to get it implemented. No-action is making life miserable to many.

Even in my personal life, I want to buy one sofa which needs large space. For that, I bought new home and now have waiting for its possession/movement. After that only, sofa will come. We all go in this mode at some point in life.

Let me think like a delivery orientation. Nothing is perfect in this world. If someone has to grow higher, it needs volume. Deliver more reports which management could not understand or open more restaurants or build more residential units as demand is there. Top management loves delivery on time. Delay has penalties like opportunities cost/ interest cost. Management also reward people who deliver on numbers or goals. They don’t have time to go on site and see the real delivery. We all want success and timely delivery makes life easy.

It has negative side too. Sometimes, it leaves customer unhappy. He may buy as he has no other option available. In long run, it creates poor managers at top position who are not properly trained.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Avatar of admin

by admin

Task Vs Resources

January 26, 2012 in Contradictions / Conflicts

Both are important to finish any goal or project. Any weakness in tasks and resource management may fail the project. Let’s discuss four possible outcomes

1. Low tasks and Low resources: It means low productivity. In this situation, we don’t know what to do and how to do it.

2. Low tasks and High resources: It creates job losses in globe/country/society. Lack of tasks means whole world has reached at perfection level. There is no need for future development which won’t be case at this point at least. However, US/Europe is facing this situation because of work moved to low income areas. It is no more cost effective now. In country like India too, it is easy to find resources at cheap level however, it is difficult to find the ideas to give them right employment.

3. High tasks and Low resources: Companies try to optimise resource with tasks. Overtime and crisis management situation arises in this scenario. Delay in services and quality compromises happen in this situation. It happens. Getting right talented, motivated, and trained people to get right output is major concern in this scene.

4. High tasks and High resource: It is the success formulae. You have enough work and enough trained resources to feed it. You have to just manage the growth demand.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Avatar of admin

by admin

Centralization vs Decentralization

December 12, 2011 in Contradictions / Conflicts

Business always struggle to optimise centralization or decentralization needs. Better utilization of resource needed to get maximum benefits. Here, I am noting down some benefits of centralization strategies
Centralization

Pro
1. Optimised use of resources – single resource can be allocated to multiple tasks. In downtime, it makes sense to centralise the activities.
2. Better control of budgets – Sites/locations demands their own shares based on their assumptions. In same company, single vendor can ask different prices at different locations. Centralization helps in getting control.
3. Standardization: It brings same rules and regulation across the sites. It becomes easier for auditor to audit on same norms.
4. Better processes: It helps in building robust processes.

Cons
1. Create power centres: It generally creates power centres. Without approval of centralised location, nothing can move
2. User touch: It misses the end user touch sometimes which is biggest advantage of decentralization. Voice of customer sometimes goes missing.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Avatar of admin

by admin

Family Vs Social Life – Conflict 9

December 5, 2011 in Contradictions / Conflicts

I have seen many people suffering from this contradiction. They focus on friends and left family in trouble. They spend hours on phone and keep family waiting. In India, Alcohal is a meeting points for friends. People forget family for it.

Opposite side is also there. People focus on family so much that they miss so much learning from social interaction. Friends are great social learning platform. Student preparing for compitative exams just work harder and harder to fulfill family expectations.

I feel balance has answer of this issue. We need to understand both are important in life. And both have their meanings. Leaving one side will create vaccum of other. Student focusing on study may find lost in social world. When he joins college, he felt left out.

On other hand, people focusing on friends, may loose their family. Family may suffer with pain of your bad company. Even if you are in good company like spirtual teams, family will miss your love and precious time. IF you are suffering form this problem, try to make balance between these two.

I have one friend who is too spiritual. He has spirtual goals in life. His son always keep compliaining about his commitment to him. He can simply solve this problem by giving balance to his family and self needs.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)